The three most common subjects for my dog walking time:
- People issues
- How to add even more value for our customers
- Nothing - just trying to be aware (probably the most valuable)
Making enterprise HR ideas and tools accessible to smaller businesses.
Then best practice says you should:
I don't disagree with any of the above but the work involved must be in proportion. There are traps to fall into at each stage:
There is always a reason why an IT project goes wrong and being over ambitious or complex is up there at the top of the list.

It's easy to say that we want everything, now, and at a rock bottom price but that's not the real world. It's also a recipe for a failed implementation.
In most cases, the answer is a blend of the three but the mix will determine how your project proceeds. For example, a project focused on price will almost certainly result in less functionality being delivered, whereas a focus on functionality will take longer to deliver and probably cost more. No implementation is the same so consider the triangle (right) and think about where your priorities are.
We find that there are 4 broad categories of implementation:
Balanced - requiring “a little of all of them”, is where most of our clients actually sit. They want a balance between a solution that is implemented quickly, but is somewhat tailored to their needs, with enough training to get both users and administrators up and running with a minimum of stress, effort, and delay.
Speed - A focus on speed means getting the system as fast as you can. This does not necessarily mean sacrificing functionality or quality, but can result in a higher cost. It may involve several consultants working together on a system. Speed focused implementations need careful project management.
Functionality - The functionality focus typically suits organisations that want the system configured to their specific needs, detailed user and administration training, and have lots of data to be migrated from one or more legacy systems.
Price - A focus on price looks for all options to keeping the cost down. This includes absolute out-of the-box functionality, and training to give administrators enough information to continue the learning process themselves in the use, setup and administration of the system, and to train the end users themselves.
The best route to understanding the right mix for your implementation is to meet with the vendor and discuss the options, your in-house skills and how critical the system will be. It's also worth pointing out that the mix will change from system to system and should not be a company standard
Whilst there are still two polarised views about the economy, many people I speak to are seeing a pick up in their business. Let’s face it, most small businesses have had a tough time over the past year and any sign of improvement is very welcome. For many companies an upturn sees a wave of pent up demand heading their way – the customer always needed your product but was unwilling or unable to pay for it.
To ride this wave you have you have three choices:
Now is the time to look at how you are working and question if it is the most efficient way. This covers both what you are doing and how you do it.
In the HR world it is a good time to review how your organisation manages admin heavy processes. Is there away to automate tasks, leaving you to manage the people not the paperwork? HR professionals need to be out there building confidence in their teams rather than doing admin.
Sales and marketing people can always improve processes. We sales people hate to be tied down to a system but grudgingly admit that things work best when we are. I for one need to go through my sales pipeline to remove those deals that never seem to close – it was worth chasing them when I had the time but now I’ve got enough ‘winners’ to work on.
I would also suggest that there are a number of less relevant but still important questions such as:
There are certain situations where costs have to be dramatically reduced in a hurry and I am not talking about these. However, in most circumstances system support should be viewed as an investment to manage a business risk. Talk to your provider to get the most out of a support contract and they should respond by working with you to get the most out of your system.